👋 Need 3D Services?

Hello there! Let’s discuss your project. Our 3D specialists will contact you in 30 minutes!
Elis Kostabi
Team lead
3Dstudio.co
Outsource 3D rendering for competition entries, planning submissions and the frames a client finally signs off on. We model from your drawings and art-direct the set to the visual language your practice already works in, so the boards look like your office made them.
We only take a limited number of projects each month, so every scene gets top quality.
Architects, developers & interior designers
Working for 215 companies since 2013
125 of 220 clients came back
More than half of our clients have hired us again
Most architects can name the studio behind an image at fifty paces. That is the problem, not the compliment it sounds like.
We take art direction from your back catalogue rather than from our portfolio. Send three to five images your last set should have looked like, and the hour, sky, palette, entourage density and lens are set from those.
A studio with a signature is selling you its signature: the same amber dusk and the same three people crossing the same foreground, on a school competition in March and an apartment brochure in June. Juries notice, and so do the practices you are bidding against.
Since 2013 we have worked for 215 companies in 17 countries on schemes with nothing stylistically in common, from timber cabins to city blocks. Holding a different visual language per client is the ordinary job here, which is why 125 of our 220 clients came back.
3D rendering for architects turns a coordinated model into the image a jury, a committee or a client looks at. The model stays yours; the light, material finish and context change, so the frame reads as your scheme, not a generic one.
Most architecture firms already run Enscape or Twinmotion in house for testing an idea at the desk. What gets commissioned out is the moment the image leaves the building and has to carry the argument.
A competition is decided in the time it takes to walk a board. The images must make the idea legible at a glance: what the building is, where it sits, what it is made of, and not look like the entry two boards along.
So the set is built around the argument you are making, not whichever view renders most easily. If the scheme is about a roof, the hero is about the roof, even when that camera is awkward to light.

Consent is rarely one meeting. A scheme gets deferred, loses a storey, changes a cladding, and you have to show the same street from the same place with only that change in it. Two images made months apart cannot be compared, and somebody in the room says so.
So the camera is recorded with the scene, down to the coordinate and the hour, and the scene is kept. The resubmission comes back as the same frame with the change in it, keeping the discussion on the storey rather than the sky.

Every project has the meeting where somebody asks to see it from the other side. It is a fair question, almost never asked early, and answering it late leaves the cost yours to explain, a poor position to argue design from.
Which is why the camera is settled first, on an untextured clay view, within days of the brief. On grey geometry a viewpoint is free to move, and by the time a frame is expensive to defend, that argument has already happened.

Rarely a single image. A submission is a set, and it has to hold together from the first board to the last page.
The hero, the context aerial, one or two interiors and whatever view carries the idea, built in one pass so the light and palette match.
The scheme in its real street, from the viewpoints the case officer asked for, with context modelled rather than pasted in.
One image per decision, cut from the scene that already exists. Two cladding options side by side, or one room at two ceiling heights.
Sectional perspectives, dollhouse cutaways and coloured plans, drawn off the same model as the renders so the two cannot contradict.
Only the number of views in the set changes, not the process.
The commonest brief: one planning submission, two or three views, priced by the set rather than by the size of the building.
Enough units that the elevations have to read as one street, not four repeated houses stood side by side.
Aerial context, more than one typology in a single scheme, and a set built to hold together across the whole board.
An Estonian studio working since 2013 across the Nordics, the Baltics, Europe, the UK, the US, Canada and Australia. Comments in the evening, a revised frame by morning.
Unconsented schemes, competition entries and unannounced launches are commercially sensitive. We work under NDA without being asked and never publish a project without permission.
No account-manager layer. Send the files, get a real number, talk to the person building the scene. Fewer hand-offs is why the first preview lands closer to right.
Across a set, or across years of repeat work, the light, materials and camera discipline hold. Ten freelancers cannot do that, and it is visible on page four of a brochure.
The hero usually carries the argument. Supporting views can often be simpler and cheaper without weakening the set.
A clay view works from massing alone, so waiting for a finished material schedule usually costs time, not accuracy.
One partner approving the three to five reference images before the clay stage saves a rework later in the set.

Upload CAD, PDF, Revit or SketchUp files, or a photo of a sketch. We prepare the brief from your files, so there is no questionnaire. You get one fixed project price and a delivery date within 30 minutes.

We build the 3D model without materials and place the camera. The viewpoint, lens, height and time of day are agreed on this grey model, when changes are quick and cheap.

The same view with materials, lighting and surroundings added. You see it early, while the light and the finishes can still be changed easily. 2 revision rounds are included, and we keep refining until you approve.

The approved image, fully finished and delivered in 4K, with larger sizes for print on request and full usage rights. Every further view in the set uses the scene already built, so each extra image costs much less than the first.
The light, the palette and the entourage were decided per project by different people, which is why these do not read as a series. That is the point.






Priced per project, not per image. This is what changes the number.
One approval frame and a twelve-image competition board are different jobs, priced accordingly.
A verified planning view with neighbouring buildings costs more than a scheme shown on its own.
A coordinated Revit or ArchiCAD model moves faster than a sketch that still needs interpreting.
A competition date changes the order of work more than it changes the price.
What moves the quote, and what to send to get it fast.
Opens the upload form. Send what you have; no sales call.
Practices send us work at every stage of tidiness, from a coordinated Revit model to a photograph of a sketch on tracing paper. Neither one slows the quote down.
Facades and streetscapes in real light and real context, at ground level.
Exterior rendering
The rooms behind the facade, built from the same model and lit to match.
Interior rendering
Coloured plans, cutaways and dollhouse views for the board and the brochure.
3D floor plans
A flythrough or an approach sequence cut from the scene you already paid for.
3D animationThe questions we are asked most before a project starts. Still unsure? Send the drawings and we will tell you what we would do with them.
Ask us directly
Concept, planning or competition stage, from a coordinated model or a sketch on tracing paper: one number, a delivery date, and a clay view within days of the go-ahead.
We take a limited number of projects each month.